Many osteopathic schools are the whole institution, not a college inside one, and several run a separate account per campus. Their content leans on students and campus life where allopathic programs lean on research.
The COCA-accredited osteopathic programs, a younger and faster-growing sector than the allopathic one. Many are freestanding health-sciences institutions, and the multi-campus ones teach the same curriculum in several states at once.
Campus accounts sharing one institution are planned together and reported separately, so a branch campus is not judged by the flagship's numbers. Comparison runs against other osteopathic schools.
Reach keeps every campus in one calendar with the rest of the institution, measured against MD-program peers.
Colleges of osteopathic medicine run their campus accounts in Reach and benchmark against other DO programs. We will list them here as they agree to be named.
Each campus account is planned in the shared calendar and reported on its own, so a newer branch is not measured against the founding campus.
Other COCA-accredited osteopathic programs. Because many of these schools post from a main institutional account rather than a college sub-account, the cohort is built to include both.
Osteopathic schools post proportionally more about students and campus life and less about research, which tracks the sector's primary-care and community-placement mission.
Newer programs join the cohort as soon as they are tracked, and the sample size travels with every figure so you can see how thin or deep a number is.
Reach measures how higher education social teams actually post, so you can compare your own accounts against the cohorts these figures come from and see the gap in your own numbers.